Synthesis and Identification of some new β-Lactam derivatives from 6-amino-1,3-dimethyluracil and study their antioxidant activity

 

Huda Jamal Al-Adhami*, Suaad M. H. Al-Majidi, Thikra Hasan Mathkor

1Department of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: huda1.aladhami@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

In this work the synthesis of a 6-( amino acetyl chloride)-1,3-dimethylpyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl [1] by reaction of 6-amino-1,3-dimethyluracil with chloroacetyl chloride, triethylamine in DMF as a solvent, the product [1] then, reacted with a hydrazine hydrate in absolute ethanol to produce hydrazide derivative [2]. A series of Schiff bases (3-8) were synthesized in moderate yields via a reaction of 6-(hydrazinoacetamide)-1,3-dimethyl pyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl [2], substituted aryl aldehydes and glacial acetic acid under reflux conditions. The resulting [3-8] could be useful for the synthesis of [9-26] β-Lactams derivatives. They have been achieved by cyclization of Schiff bases compounds with different reagents (chloroacetyl chloride, phenyl isocyanate and phenyl isothiocyanate) in THF solvent. All newly synthesized compounds conformation were characterized in detail by FT-IR and NMR spectroscopy including 1D NMR experiments (1H and 13C). The study antioxidant of some new compounds.

 

KEYWORDS: Uracil; Schiff bases; β-lactam; antioxidant.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Uracil as a specific base in RNA plays an important role in gene coding and various physiological processes of organisms. It's derivatives are anti-tumor agent used for the treatment of prostate cancer(1,2). Many uracil derivatives have been reported to have antioxidative and anti-inflammatory activities(3-5). Oxidative stress is defined as the alteration produced by the imbalance between oxidants and an­tioxidants species, It can be caused by an excess of oxidants, antioxidant deficiency, or both factors simultaneously. Currently, there is a growing interest in oxidative stress because it can lead to cell death and contribute to the development of multiple pathologies(6). and it is reported that uracils show anti-viral and antitumour, Anti-HIV characteristics in addition to bactericidal, herbicidal and insecticidal features(7-9). The heterocyclic ring can be bound to a uracil ring using different strategies.(10)

 

Uracil and its modified derivatives belong to a class of compounds important in drug discovery with a wide range of biological activities and as pharmaceutical intermediates and/or prodrugs, play an important role in drug development, and as chemotherapeutic agents(11,12). β-lactam antibiotics are a class of antibiotic consisting of all antibiotic agents, it plays an essential role in medicine and consequently in pharmaceutical industry. The discovery of penicillin and cephalosporin were undoubtedly a milestone in the history of modern medicine, antifungal, anticancer, antiviral, inhibition of HIV and anti-hyperglycemic activity(13-16). In various diseases such as infectious diseases, oxidative stress occurs secondary to the initial disease but plays an important role in immune or vascular complications, the relative antioxidant effect of some β-lactam antibiotics such as ampicillin on oxygen-reactive species has been reported and a possible therapeutic role for β-lactam agents in protecting host tissues from oxidative damage has been proposed(17-19)

 

EXPERIMENT SECTION:

Material and Instruments:

Chemicals used in this work are supplied from BDH, Fluka, Merck and Sigma Aldrich companies and used without further purification. Melting points were uncorrected and registered via digital Stuart scientific SMP3 melting point device. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) used to check purity and homogeneity of synthesis compounds. FTIR spectra of the compounds in the (4000-600) cm-1 spectral range were recorded on SHIMAZU FTIR-8400 Fourier transform Infrared spectrophotometer using KBr discs. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on VARIAN 500MHz in Iran, instrument using TMS as internal reference and DMSO-d6 as a solvent. UV-VIS spectra were recorded by Shimadzu-spectrophotometer and Apel PD-303- spectrophotometer, Japan.

 

6-(amino acetylchloride)-1,3-dimethylpyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl [1](20):

In a round bottom flask (50mL) equipped with magnetic stirring bar, 6-amino-1,3-dimethyluracil (2.0g, 0.0129 mol), triethylamine (1.8mL, 0.0129mol) were dissolved in DMF (15mL). The round bottom flask was cooled to 0°C for 30 min with stirring and then added drop wise chloroacetyl chloride (1.1mL, 0.0129mol). The mixture was stirred 4 h at room temperature, and afterwards refluxed for (75- 85)°C for 7 h. After the completion of reaction, the reaction mixture was poured into ice water. Then solid product was filtered off, washed with water. The obtained product was purification by ether. Some of the physical properties and yield of compound [1] are listed in Table (1).

 

6-(hydrazinoacetamide)-1,3-dimethyl pyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl[2](21):

6-amino acetyl chloride-(1,3-dimethyl pyrimidin-6-yl) [1] (1.0g, 0.0043 mol) and hydrazine hydrate (0.3mL, 0.0086mol) were dissolved in absolute ethanol (10mL) with continuous stirring. The stirring reaction mixture was refluxed for 4 h. Subsequently, the combined organic phases were cooled off before pouring into crushed ice. The obtained precipitate has been filtered, washed with ether, dried and purified by recrystallization from ether. Physical properties are listed in Table (1).

 

N-[6-(Substituted benzylidene hydrazone)acetamide]-1,3-dimethyl pyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl [3-8](22) :

A mixture of compound [2] (1.0g, 0.0044mol), different substituted aromatic aldehydes (0.0044mol) in absolute ethanol (10mL) and (3-5) drops of glacial acetic acid was refluxed in water bath for about (6-7) h. The excess solvent was evaporating under reduced pressure. Then the crude product was dried, recrystallized from Dioxan. Some of the physical properties and yield of compounds [3-8] are listed in Table (2).

 

N-[6-((3-chloro-2-substituted phenyl)-4-oxoazetidin-1-yl)amino)acet amide]-1,3-dimethylpyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl [9-14](21) :

A solution of appropriate Schiff base derivatives [3-8] (0.0016mol) in (10mL) of dioxan as solvent; chloroacetyl chloride (0.2mL, 0.0016mol); triethylamine (Et3N) (0.1mL, 0.0016mol) was added. The mixture was refluxed for (14-16) h. The reaction mixture was cooled at room temperature and the precipitate was filtered, washed with cool water and recrystallized from ethanol. Physical properties of compounds [9-14] are listed in Table (3).

 

N-[6-((2-oxo-3-phenyl-2-substituted phenyl)-1,3-diazetidine-1-yl) amino) acetamide]-1,3-dimethylpyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl [15-20]:

N-[6-((3-phenyl-2-substituted phenyl-4-thio)-1,3-diazetidine-1-yl) amino) acetamide]-1,3-dimethylpyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl [21-26] (23):

A mixture of Schiff bases [3-8] (0.0016 mol) with THF (10mL) , phenyl isocyanate (0.2mL, 0.0016mol)  or phenyl isothiocyanate (0.2mL, 0.0016mol) was added in little amounts in round bottomed flask with continuous stirring and also the reaction mixture was gradually heated to laboratory temperature degree, then refluxed for 6 h. the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue treated with a mixture of (1:1) ethyl acetate and petroleum ether. The resulted precipitate was filtered and dried. Some of the physical properties and yield of compounds [11-26] and [21-26] are listed in Table (4) and Table (5) respectively.


Table 1. Physical properties and FT-IR spectral data cm-1 of the synthesized compounds [1 and 2]

Com. No.

Physical Properties

Major FT-IR Absorption cm-1

Structures

M.P.  ͦ C

Yield %

Color

n(C-H) olefin

n(C-H) aliph.

n(C=O) amide

n(C=C)

Others

1

 

88-90

85

Brown crystal

3068

2970

2894

1745

1699

 

1645

n(N-H) 3317

n(C-Cl) 779

2

 

141-143

77

Brown

3070

2962

2829

1710

1662

 

1643

n(N-H)overlap with n(NH2)

Asym. 3421

Sym. 3334

 

Table 2. Physical properties and FT-IR spectral data cm-1 of the synthesized Schiff bases compounds [3-8]

Com. No.

Physical Properties

Major FT-IR Absorption cm-1

Structures

M.P. C

Yield %

Color

n(N-H)

n(C-H) arom.

n(C-H) aliph.

n(C=O) amide

n(C=N)

n (C=C)

Others

3

 

87-89

80

Gray crystal

3382

3067

2954

1710

1666

1635

δ(N-H) 1620

 

4

 

162-163

78

Pale yellow

3303

3066

2962

1718

1672

1637

n(C=C) 1573

δ(N-H) 1546

nP-Position 824

5

 

185-186

83

Yellow

3342

3089

2979

2912

 

1714

1670

1635

 

n(C-N) 1176

nP-Position 813

6

 

178-180

71

Deep yellow

3301

3098

2941

2839

1714

1668

1633

n(O-H) 3340

nP-Position 817

 

7

 

143-145

88

Deep red

3406

3096

2968

2927

2840

1695

1649

1623

n(C-O-C) Asym. 1251

Sym. 1164

nP-Position 833

8

 

120-122

85

Deep yellow

3340

3097

2999

2923

2813

1747

1714

1668

1631

n(NO2) Asym. 1508

Sym. 1326

nP-Position 840

 

Table 3. Physical properties and FT-IR spectral data cm-1 of the synthesized compounds [9-14]

Com. No.

Physical Properties

Major FT-IR Absorption cm-1

Structures

M.P.     ͦ C

Yield %

Color

n

(N-H)

n(C-H) arom.

n

(C-H) aliph.

n

(C=O) amide

n

(C-N)

Others

9

 

202-204

85

Brown

3377

3099

3080

2960

2925

2850

1708

1695

 

1132

n(C=C) 1650

10

 

216-218

81

Pale violet

3384

3049

2960

2927

2860

1722

1681

1172

n(C-Cl) 954

nP-Position 833

11

 

213-215

80

Deep red

3461

3095

2943

2910

2856

2808

1731

1668

 

1176

n(C=C) 1602

n(C-Cl) 948

nP-Position 813

12

 

221-223

67

Black

3406

3095

3062

2923

2852

1697

 

1193

n(O-H) 3444

n(C=C) 1649

nP-Position 850

13

 

230-231

84

Pale pink

3436

3090

2970

2935

2839

1735

1701

1683

 

1166

n(C=C) 1647

n(C-O-C) Asym. 1251

Sym. 1166

nP-Position 833

14

 

201-203

87

Yellow

3398

3096

2952

2931

2842

1706

1691

 

1107

 

n(C=C) 1647

nP-Position 842

Table 4. Physical properties and FT-IR spectral data cm-1 of the synthesized compounds [15-20]

Com. No.

Physical Properties

Major FT-IR Absorption cm-1

Structures

M.P.     ͦ C

Yield %

Color

n(N-H)

n(C-H) arom.

n(C-H) aliph.

n(C=O) amide

n(C-N)

Others

15

 

179-181

76

Pale brown

3213

3096

 

2960

 

1720

1670

1174

-

 

16

 

215-217

73

Pale gray

3193

3096

2991

2904

1722

1670

1174

 

n(C-Cl) 958

nP-Position 835

17

 

160-162

82

Pale brown

3211

3058

2977

2908

2856

2802

1720

1670

1178

nP-Position 813

18

 

201-203

70

Pale brown

3296

3097

2997

2954

2896

1718

1670

1172

n(O-H) 3346

n(C=C) 1603

nP-Position 830

19

 

207-209

71

Deep red crystal

3236

3010

2929

2840

1697

1649

1164

n(C=C) 1600

n(C-O-C) Asym. 1249

Sym. 1164

nP-Position 833

20

 

163-164

85

Pale pink

3201

3095

2958

1689

1145

n(NO2) Asym. 1514

Sym. 1340

nP-Position 844

 

Table 5. Physical properties and FT-IR spectral data cm-1 of the synthesized compounds [21-26]

Com. No.

Physical Properties

Major FT-IR Absorption cm-1

Structures

M.P    ͦ C

Yield %

Color

n(N-H)

n(C-H) arom.

n(C-H) aliph.

n(C=O) amide

n(C-N)

Others

21

 

153-154

81

Pale pink

3207

3095

2995

2945

2875

1670

 

1186

n(C=S) 1398

22

 

178-180

80

Pale gray

3203

3002

3943

2871

1670

 

1186

n(C=S) 1398

n(C-Cl) 956

nP-Position 837

23

 

142-144

80

Deep brown

3258

3074

2975

2893

2802

1689

1178

n(C=S) 1255

nP-Position 813

24

 

145-147

73

Pale pink

3213

3097

2937

1668

 

1188

n(C=S) 1398

n(O-H) 3213

 

25

 

163-165

79

Brown

3315

3095

2975

1668

 

1164

n(C=S) 1397

n(C-O-C) Asym. 1255

Sym. 1161

26

 

188-190

85

Brown

3342

3095

2987

1676

 

1191

n(C=S) 1396

n(NO2) Asym. 1514

Sym. 1338

 


Total antioxidant capacity(24):

The total antioxidant capacity of the synthesized compounds was evaluated by the phosphomolybdenum method. A different concentrations (50, 100, 150μg/mL) of an aliquot compound solutions  was combined with 1 mL of reagent solution ((0.6M) sulfuric acid, (28mM) sodium phosphate and (4 mM) ammonium molybdate). The tubes containing the reaction solution were capped and incubated at 95°C for 90 min. Then, the tubes were cooled to room temperature, the absorbance of each solution was measured at 695nm using a spectrophotometer against blank. The total antioxidant activity is expressed as the number of gram equivalent of ascorbic acid. Different concentrations (10, 20, 30, 50, 70, 90, 120, 180, 200µg/mL) of ascorbic acid with DW where used to plot the calibration curve.

 

Reducing power assay(25):

The reducing power assay of β-Lactam derivatives was determined by using various concentrations of samples (50, 100, 150μg/mL), which were mixed with (1mL) sodium phosphate buffer (0.2M, pH6.6) and (1mL) potassium ferric cyanide 1%. The solutions were incubated at 50°C for 20 min. Then (1mL) of  trichloroacetic acid 10% was added. The tubes were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min. The upper layer of solution (2.5mL) was mixed with (2.5ml) of distilled water and (0.3mL) of fresh prepared ferric chloride 0.1%. The absorbance was measured at 700nm using a spectrophotometer against blank. Ascorbic acid was used as standard.

 

Nitric Oxide Radical Scavenging Assay(26):

The nitric oxide radical scavenging assay was determined the nitric oxide radical scavenging activity of the synthesized compounds by using Griess reagent, the absorbance were measured and recorded as A0. After that a solution of (2mL, 10mM) sodium nitroprusside dissolved in (0.5mL) phosphate buffer (0.2M, pH 7.4) were mixed with (0.5mL) of various concentrations of samples (20, 50, 100, 150, 200μg/mL). Tubes were capped and incubated at 25°C for 150min. Then (0.5mL) of incubation solution was withdrawn and mixed with (0.5mL) of Griess reagent; ((1.0mL) sulfanilic acid reagent (0.1% w/v) and (1mL) of naphthylethylenediamine dichloride (0.1% w/v)). The solution was incubated at room temperature for 30min. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a spectrophotometer against blank and ascorbic acid was used as standard. The inhibition percentage of nitric oxide radical was calculated using the following equation:

 

                                A0 - At

% Inhibition of No. = ––––––––––––– × 100

                                   A0

Where A0 is the absorbance before the reaction and 𝐴𝑡 is the absorbance after the reaction.

 

Superoxide free radical scavenging activity(27):

The superoxide free radical scavenging activity of β-Lactam derivatives were measured as described by using the NBT method. The reaction mixture containing of (6.6μM) EDTA, (3μg) NaCN, (2μM) riboflavin, (50μM) NBT and (58mM, pH 7.8) of phosphate buffer with various concentrations of the synthesized compounds and  in a final volume of (3mL). Optical density was measured at 560nm using a spectrophotometer. The test tubes were uniformly illuminated for 15 min with an incandescent lamp, after which the optical density was measured again at 560 using the same spectrophotometer against blank. Ascorbic acid was used as standard. The inhibition percentage of superoxide radical generation was measured by comparing mean absorbance values of the control and those of the test substances. IC50 values were obtained in μg versus percentage inhibition from the linear plot drawn of concentration of tested compound solution (50, 100 and 150μg/mL) and the ordinate represented the average percent of antioxidant activity from three separate tests.

 

Hydrogen Peroxide Radical Scavenging Assay(28):

Hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity (H2O2) of synthesized compounds was determined as follow: (40 mM) of hydrogen peroxide solution, in phosphate buffer (0.2M, pH 7.4). The synthesized compounds with concentration of (20, 30 and 40) μg/mL were added to a hydrogen peroxide solution (0.6mL, 40mM). The absorbance of H2O2 measured at 230nm using a UV-VIS spectroscopy and determined after 10 min. against blank and ascorbic acid. The percentage of hydrogen peroxide scavenge activity was then calculated using Equation 1

 

                                   A0 - At

% Scavenging activity = ––––––––––––– × 100

                                         A0

 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:

The steps of the synthesis 6-( amino acetyl chloride)-1,3-dimethylpyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl [1], 6-(hydrazinoacetamide)-1,3-dimethyl pyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl [2], it's Schiff bases derivatives [3-8], chloroazetidine-2-one and β-Lactams are shown in the Scheme (1):

 


Scheme (1)

 


Compound [1] was prepared via the nucleophilic acetyl substitution of 6-amino-1,3-dimethyluracil with chloroacetyl chloride in the presence of triethylamine as a catalyst in dimethylformamide at 0°C. Scheme(1).The mechanism of this reaction involved nucleophilic attack of amino group in substituted primary aromatic amines on carbonyl group of chloroacetyl chloride, followed by elimination of HCl molecule(29),shown in Scheme(2).

 

Scheme (2): Mechanism of the prepared compound [1]

 

Compound[1] was afforded as brown crystals of (85%)  yield with a melting point of (88-90oC), also, Silver nitrate test gave (+ve) in the presence of chlorine group (30). FTIR spectrum data of compound[1] showed disappearance of a υ(NH2) while υ(N-H) at (3317) and υ(C=O) of amide at (1745) cm-1 was appeared with still appearance of υ(C=O) of amides(31) at(1699)cm-1as shown in Table (1)

 

Compound[1] was reacted with hydrazine hydrate to give hydrazine derivative [2] in absolute ethanol as a solvent. FTIR spectrum of this compound indicates that υ(C-Cl) (779) cm-1 was disappeared from the spectrum while appearance of  the asymmetric and symmetric stretching bands of υ(NH2) absorption band at (3421)cm-1 Asym., (3334)cm-1 sym, also the presence of a strong sharp bands of  υ(N-H) at (3182) cm-1, υ(C-H) aliphatic(31) at (2962, 2829)cm-1 and υ(C=O) at (1710, 1662) cm-1 as shown in Table (1). 1H-NMR spectrum of compound [2] showed a singlet signal at δ=(3.03)ppm due to (-CH3) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.25)ppm due to () protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.52)ppm is due to (-CH2-) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(4.19)ppm for (N-N-H) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(4.91)ppm due to (=CH-) proton, signals at δ=(6.85)ppm belonged to  (-NH2) protons and a singlet signal at δ=(8.57)ppm due to (O=C-N-H) proton as listed in Table (6) and shown in Figure(1). 13C-NMR spectral data were listed in Table (2) and shown in Figure(2).

 

Compound[3-8] was synthesized by condensation reaction of compound [1] with different substituted aromatic aldehydes and few drops of glacial acetic acid in absolute ethanol to form Schiff's bases [3-8]. Scheme(1).FTIR spectra showed absorption bands at (3340-3303)cm-1 for υ(N-H) and confirmed the formation of compound [3-8] from the appearance of  the bands at (1637-1623) cm-1 due to υ(C=N) of Schiff's bases [3-8] respectively. With the disappearance of υ(NH2) at (3421)cm-1 Asym., (3334)cm-1 sym. All details of FTIR Spectral data of compounds [3-8] were listed in Table (2). 1H-NMR spectrum of compound [5] showed a singlet signal at δ= (2.87)ppm due to (N-(CH3)2) protons, singlet signal at δ=(3.07)ppm due to (-CH3) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.08)ppm due to () protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.31)ppm is due to (-CH2-) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(4.19)ppm for (N-N-H) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(4.93)ppm due to (=CH-) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(6.65)ppm is due to (N=CH-) protons, signals at δ=(6.66,7.62) ppm are due to aromatic rings protons and a singlet signal at δ=(9.03) ppm belonged to (O=C-N-H) proton as shown in Table (6). 13C-NMR spectral data of compound[5] are listed in Table (7).

 

1H-NMR spectrum of compound [6] showed a singlet signal at δ=(3.03)ppm due to (-CH3) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.14)ppm due to () protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.58)ppm is due to (-CH2-) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.99)ppm for (N-N-H) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(4.91)ppm due to (=CH-) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(6.50)ppm is due to (N=CH-) protons, signals at δ=(7.01-7.48)ppm are due to aromatic rings protons, a singlet signal at δ=(9.01)ppm belonged to (O=C-N-H) proton and a singlet signal at δ=(10.80)ppm is due to (O-H) proton as shown in Table (6). 13C-NMR spectral data of compound[6] are listed in Table (7).

1H-NMR spectrum of compound [7] showed a singlet signal at δ=(3.18)ppm due to (-CH3) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.21)ppm due to () protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.36)ppm is due to (-CH2-) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.81)ppm is due to (O-CH3) proton,a singlet signal at δ=(4.90)ppm for (N-N-H) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(4.99)ppm due to (=CH-) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(6.52)ppm is due to (N=CH-) protons, signals at δ=(7.02-7.78)ppm are due to aromatic rings protons and a singlet signal at δ=(8.90)ppm belonged to (O=C-N-H) proton as shown in Table (6). 13C-NMR spectral data of compound[7] are listed in Table (7).

 

On other hand, The Schiff's bases [3-8] were reacted with different reagents by various methods to give different cyclic compounds. First method; Schiff bases[3-8] were reacted with chloroacetyl chloride followed by the addition of triethylamine producing compounds of chloroazetidine-2-one compounds [9-14] linked to N-[6-(Substituted benzylidene hydrazone)acetamide]-1,3-dimethyl pyrimidine-2,4-dione-6-yl [3-8]. The structure of azetidine-2-one has been confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy. FTIR spectrum for Compound [9-14] showed the appearance of the absorption band at (1064-1010) cm-1 due to υ(C-Cl azetidine ring), (3461-3377) cm-1 for υ(N-H) and bands of υ(C=O) amid appearance at (1735-1649)cm-1 in addition to the disappearance bands of  υ(C=N) at (1637-1623) cm-1. All details of FTIR spectral data of compounds [9-14] are listed in Table (3). 1H-NMR spectrum of compound [13] showed a singlet signal at δ=(3.07)ppm due to (-CH3) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.17)ppm due to () protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.55)ppm is due to (-CH2-) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.81)ppm is due to (O-CH3) protons,a singlet signal at δ=(4.18)ppm for (N-N-H) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(4.91)ppm due to (=CH-) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(5.40)ppm due to (N-CH- ring) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(5.41)ppm due to (CH azetidine ring) protons, signals at δ=(7.03-7.80)ppm are due to aromatic rings protons and a singlet signal at δ=(9.51)ppm belonged to (O=C-N-H) proton as shown in Table (6). 13C-NMR spectral data of compound[13] are listed in Table (7).

 

While in the second method; reaction of Schiff bases [3-8] with phenylisocyanate and phenylthioisocyanate in THF under reflux to produce 𝛽-lactams [15-20] and [21-26]. The structure of 𝛽-lactam derivatives has been confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy. FTIR spectrum of the synthesized compounds [15-20] showed υ(N-H) at (3193-3406)cm-1 and bands of υ(C=O)  at (1722-1649)cm-1, while showed disappearance of  υ(C=N) bands at (1637-1623) cm-1. All details of FTIR spectral data of compounds [15-20] are listed in Table (4). 1H-NMR spectrum of compound [18] showed a singlet signal at δ=(3.08)ppm due to (-CH3) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.14)ppm due to () protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.45)ppm is due to (-CH2-) protons,a singlet signal at δ=(4.09)ppm for (N-N-H) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(4.89)ppm due to (=CH-) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(6.84)ppm due to (N-CH- ring) protons, signals at δ=(6.91-7.98)ppm are due to aromatic rings protons, a singlet signal at δ=(8.77)ppm belonged to (O=C-N-H) proton and and a singlet signal at δ=(9.22)ppm belonged to (O-H) proton as shown in Table (6). 13C-NMR spectral data of compound[18] are listed in Table (7).

 

FTIR spectrum for Compound [21-26] showed υ(N-H) at (3203-3458)cm-1 and bands of υ(C=O)  at (1689-1668)cm-1 in addition to the disappearance bands of υ(C=N) at (1637-1623) cm-1 with appearance of υ(C=S) at (1355- 1398)cm-1. All details of FTIR spectral data of compounds [21-26] are listed in Table (5). 1H-NMR spectrum of compound [23] showed a singlet signal at δ=(2.88)ppm due to (N(CH3)2) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.04)ppm due to (-CH3) protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.13)ppm due to () protons, a singlet signal at δ=(3.53)ppm is due to (-CH2-) protons,a singlet signal at δ=(4.21)ppm for (N-N-H) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(4.87)ppm due to (=CH-) proton, a singlet signal at δ=(5.42)ppm due to (N-CH- ring) protons, signals at δ=(6.69-7.93)ppm are due to aromatic rings protons and a singlet signal at δ=(9.90)ppm belonged to (O=C-N-H) proton as shown in Table (6). 13C-NMR spectral data of compound[23] are listed in Table (7).


 

Table 6. 1H-NMR spectral data ᵟppm for selected compounds

Com. No.

Structures

1H-NMR Spectral data(ᵟppm)

2

3.03 (s, 3H, -CH3); 3.25 (s, 3H,); 3.52 (s, 2H, -CH2-); 4.19 (s, 1H, N-N-H); 4.91 (s, 1H, =C-H); 6.85 (s, 2H, NH2); 8.57 (s, 1H, O=C-N-H)

5

2.87 (s, 6H, N-(CH3)2); 3.07 (s, 3H, -CH3); 3.09 (s, 3H,); 3.31 (s, 2H, -CH2-); 4.90 (s, 1H, N-N-H); 4.93 (s, 1H, =C-H); 6.65(s, 1H, N=CH-); 6.66,7.62 (m, 4H, Ar-H); 9.03 (s, 1H, O=C-N-H)

6

3.03(s, 3H, -CH3); 3.14 (s, 3H,); 3.58 (s, 2H, -CH2-); 3.99 (s, 1H, N-N-H); 4.91 (s, 1H, =C-H); 6.50 (s, 1H, N=CH-); 7.01-7.48 (m, 4H, Ar-H); 9.01(s,1H, O=C-N-H); 10.80 (s, 1H, O-H)

7

3.18 (s, 3H, -CH3); 3.21 (s, 3H,); 3.36 (s, 2H, -CH2-); 3.81 (s, 3H, O-CH3); 4.90 (s, 1H, N-NH); 4.99 (s, 1H, =C-H); 6.52 (s, 1H, N=CH); 7.02-7.78 (m, 4H, Ar-H); 8.90 (s, 1H, O=C-N-H)

13

3.07 (s, 3H, -CH3); 3.17 (s, 3H,); 3.55 (s, 2H, -CH2-); 3.81 (s, 3H, O-CH3); 4.18 (s, 1H, N-N-H); 4.91 (s, 1H, =C-H); 5.40 (s, 1H, N-CH- ring) ; 5.41(s, 1H, -CHCl azetidinen ring); 7.03-7.80 (m, 4H, Ar-H); 9.51 (s, 1H, O=C-N-H)

18

3.08 (s, 3H, -CH3); 3.14 (s, 3H,); 3.45 (s, 2H, -CH2-); 4.09 (s, 1H, N-N-H); 4.89 (s, 1H, =C-H); 6.84 (s, 1H, N-CH- ring );  6.91-7.98 (m, 9H, Ar-H); 8.77 (s, 1H, O=C-N-H); 9.22(s, 1H, O-H)

23

2.88 (s, 6H, N-(CH3)2); 3.04 (s, 3H, -CH3); 3.13 (s, 3H,); 3.53 (s, 2H, -CH2-); 4.21 (s, 1H, N-N-H); 4.87 (s, 1H, =C-H); 5.42 (s, 1H, N-CH- ring); 6.69-7.93 (m, 9H, Ar-H); 9.90 (s, 1H, O=C-N-H)

 

Table 7. 13C-NMR spectral data ᵟppm for selected compounds

Com. No.

Structures

13C-NMR Spectral data(ᵟppm)

2

26.90 (C1); 28.89 (C3); 91.48 (C8); 101.72 (C5); 157.46 (C6); 160.14 (C2, C4); 165.94 (C7)

5

29.01 (C14); 30.12 (C1); 41.32 (C3); 54.61 (C8); 97.11 (C5); 112.55 (C11); 126.76 (C12); 129.91 (C10); 140.52 (C13); 150.21 (C9); 153.03 (6); 162.12 (C2, C4); 168.15 (C7)

6

26.79 (C1); 28.54 (C3); 54.68 (C8); 91.19 (C5); 115.89 (C11); 115.96 (C12); 130.55 (C10); 143.3 (C13); 151.4 (C9); 153.08 (C6); 157.07 (C2, C4); 166.87 (C7)

7

27.49 (C1); 31.49 (C3); 54.15 (C8); 55.82 (C14); 104.82 (C5); 115.91 (C11); 127.01 (C12); 130.41 (C10); 143.30 (C13); 150.82 (C9); 160.92 (C4); 162.10 (C2); 168.41 (C7)

13

26.86 (C1); 28.92 (C3); 31.55 (C8); 55.83 (C16); 77.11(C5); 104.75 (C11); 115.90 (C10); 127.01 (C13); 130.41 (C14); 150.91 (C6); 160.92 (C2, C4, C9); 162.10 (C7)

18

26.90 (C1); 28.84 (C3); 58.24 (C8); 91.33 (C5); 115.96 (C16); 126.50 (C11); 128.00 (C13); 129.03 (C12, C15); 137.10 (C14); 140.15 (C10); 152.81(C6); 156.75 (C17); 162.11(C2, C4, C9); 166.10 (C7)

23

26.90 (C1); 28.95 (C3); 40.18 (C18); 53.60 (C8); 77.58 (C5); 111.87-131.71 (C11, C12, C13, C14, C15, C16); 139.65 (C10); 144.41 (C17); 151.97 (C6); 152.40 (C2, C4); 160.24 (C7); 175.34 (C9)

 


Antioxidant activity:

Generally, five different mechanisms are used to study the antioxidant activity of the compounds, namely: total antioxidant capacity (TAOC), reducing power assay (Iron reducing Activity), nitric oxide radical scavenging assay, superoxide radical scavenging (NBT) method and hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging. All the methods were generated in vitro by non-enzymatic system and determined spectrophotometrically by photo reduction method and the compounds were tested in (3-5) different concentrations.

 

In general, the phenolic compounds have been known to have antioxidant activities by their radical scavenging activities in addition of inducing antioxidant enzyme levels. The phenolic compounds are one of the most well-studied antioxidants in vitro and in vivo in terrestrial plants. Also as a marine sources marine algae are rich in various antioxidant compounds.(32) Thus, the antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds were evaluated as scavengers. For example, the studied of o-, m-, and p-cresol evinced that all three cresols acted as H2O2 scavengers. Thus, the effect of 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) decrease as follows: o-cresol > p-cresol > m-cresol. Besides these, free phenolic hydroxyl groups are essentially reported responsible of antioxidant activity. Although, aliphatic hydroxyl groups have an inverse effect on the radical scavenging activity(33).

 

Total antioxidant capacity:

The total antioxidant capacity of all synthesized compounds (1-82) was evaluated by the phosphomolybdenum assay method, which is based on the reduction of colorless Molybdenum(VI) to form blue Molybdenum(V) by using the synthesized compounds and subsequent formation of a green phosphate-Mo(V) complex in acidic pH. The antioxidant activity of the compounds were compared to standard ascorbic acid. Among the newly synthesized uracil derivatives, compounds (10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25) possess strong antioxidant capacity and reduced Mo(VI) to Mo(V) in a better way, where that compound (18) shows possess better antioxidant activity than the standard, whereas the other compounds shows weak antioxidant capacity. The results of the total antioxidant capacity are listed in Figure 1.

 

Reducing power assay:

The reducing power assay of the synthesized compounds may serve as a significant indicator of its potential antioxidant activity at different concentrations depending on the method of reducing power of antioxidant compounds was used to determine the reduction ability of the synthesized compounds. The samples solutions changes into various shades of green and blue colors. which reduced the potassium ferricyanide (Fe3+) to form potassium ferrocyanide (Fe2+), then reacted with ferric chloride to form ferric ferrous complex. The formation of Perl’s Prussian blue can be monitored by measuring the absorbance at 700 nm. Compounds (15, 21 and 24) possesses good reducing power ability among the others where their the reducing power ability is close to the standard values of ascorbic acid. While compounds (18, 22 and 25) showed better antioxidant activity than the standard. The substitution with different substituent on the phenyl of the aldehydic group of β-Lactam moiety plays an important role in reducing potential of the synthesized compounds. Although, the presence of free NH group contributes to the reducing power assay. The results of the reducing power assay are listed in Figure 2.

 

Figure 1. Comparison of total antioxidant capacity of newly synthesized compounds

 

Figure 2.Comparison of reducing power assay of the synthesized compounds

 

Nitric Oxide Radical Scavenging Activity:

In addition to reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide is also involved in inflammation, cancer, and other pathological conditions. Sodium nitroprusside produce nitrite ions by decomposing in aqueous solution at pH 7.2 In aerobic condition. NO reacts with oxygen to produce stable products (nitrate and nitrite), that can be estimated using Griess reagent. The completion between scavengers of nitric oxide and oxygen, leading to the reduced production of nitrite ions. Suppression of the released NO may be partially attributed to direct NO scavenging. The tested of the synthesized compounds were found to be moderate to weak of nitric oxide scavenging activity. The results of the nitric oxide radical scavenging assay are listed in Figure 3.

 

 

Figure 3. Effect of the synthesized compounds toward nitric oxide

 

 

Figure 4. Effect of synthesized compounds toward superoxide

 

 

Figure 5. Effect of the synthesized compounds toward hydrogen peroxide

 

Superoxide Radical Scavenging Assay:

The superoxide anion radical is normally initially formed, and its effects can be magnified because it produces other kinds of free radicals and oxidizing agents. The generation of superoxide was estimated by the (NBT) nitroblue tetrazolium method. synthesized compounds were found to be moderate to weak of superoxide radical scavengers. It should be noted that the activity of the compounds (10, 15, 18, 21 and 22) was comparable to that of standard. The better activity of compound (10) is due to the presence of two chloro groups in the molecule and two aromatic ring and hydroxyl groups in compounds (15 and 18) respectively. while the other compounds showed less superoxide radical activity. The results of the superoxide anion radical scavenging assay are listed in Figure 4.

 

Hydrogen Peroxide Radical Scavenging Assay:

Table 5 shows hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity of β-Lactam derivatives caused a strong inhibition of hydrogen peroxide. The results show the all the synthesized compounds had potent H2O2 scavenging activity which may be due to the antioxidant compounds. As the antioxidant components present in the synthesized compounds are good electron donors, they may accelerate the conversion of H2O2 to H2O. Figure 5 reports the H2O2 scavenging activity of various β-Lactam derivatives. Compounds (18, 21 and 25) were shown to scavenge the H2O2 radicals with a good inhibition percent of 25-62%. And all the tested compounds exerted moderate scavenging activity when compared to ascorbic acid as shown as Figure 5.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Jiang KU, Yi JI and Jun LI. 1, 3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of Uracil Derivatives with Nitrile Oxides: Synthesis of [1, 2, 4] Oxadiazolo [4, 5-C] Pyrimidine-5, 7 (6h)-Dione Derivatives." Tetrahedron. 2017;  73(47): 6662-6668.

2.      Gkotsos GE, Christina VI, Ioanna LA, Chrysanthi SA, Nikolaos RA, Georgios TH and Georgios DI. The Role of Sarcosine, Uracil, and Kynurenic Acid Metabolism in Urine for Diagnosis and Progression Monitoring of Prostate Cancer." Metabolites. 2017; 7(1): 1-9.

3.      Pałasz AL and Dariusz CI. In Search of Uracil Derivatives as Bioactive Agents. Uracils and Fused Uracils: Synthesis, Biological Activity and Applications." European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2015; 97: 582-611.

4.      Kostova IR and Petar YA. Antioxidant Properties of Pyrimidine and Uracil Derivatives." Current Organic Chemistry. 2017; 21(20): 2096-2108.

5.      Sorní CA, Mari LU, Moreno SA, María MI, María IN, Antonio FA, María AN, Navarro MO, Santos FU, Salvador ME and Vicente VI. Antioxidant Capacity of 5-Fluorouracile and New Fluorinated Uracil Derivates." Nereis: revista iberoamericana interdisciplinar de métodos, modelización y simulación. 2018; 10: 99-105.

6.      Zhao SH, Ke LI, Yi JI and Jun LI. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel 1-(Aryl-Aldehyde-Oxime) Uracil Derivatives as a New Class of Thymidine Phosphorylase Inhibitors." European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2018; 144: 41-51.

7.      Alper TU, Murat ŞE, Claudiu SU and Deniz EK. Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitory Properties of Some Uracil Derivatives." Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry. 2017; 32(1): 74-77.

8.      Paramonova MA, Anastasia KH, Katherine SE and Mikhail NO. Mendeleev Commun. 2017; 27: 85-87.

9.      Putz MI, Nicoleta DU and Adriana IS. Double Variational Binding—(Smiles) Conformational Analysis by Docking Mechanisms for Anti-HIV Pyrimidine Ligands." International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(8): 19553-19601.

10.    Zou JU, Ling WU, Zheng MI, Ping ZH, Zuo HO. Determination of the Main Nucleosides and Nucleobases in Natural and Cultured Ophiocordyceps Xuefengensis." Molecules. 2017; 22(9) 1530.

11.    Kim SE, Minhee LE, So YO, Soo MI, Eun JE, Jae SU, Jihyae AN, Jiyoun LE, and Jeewoo LE. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 3-(2-Aminoethyl) Uracil Derivatives as Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (Gnrh) Receptor Antagonists." European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2018; 145: 413-424.

12.   Kozanecka OK, Weroni KA, Beata JA, Tomasz PO, Renata JA, Monika SK and Lucyna MR. Spectroscopy, Molecular Modeling and Anti-Oxidant Activity Studies on Novel Conjugates Containing Indole and Uracil Moiety." Journal of Molecular Structure. 2018; 1169: 130-137.

13.   Stecko SE, Bartłomiej FU and Marek CH. Kinugasa Reaction: An Ugly Duckling of-Lactam Chemistry." Tetrahedron 70 (2014): 7817-7844.

14.   Abrams EL, Adelle AT, Tiffany WO and Moshe BE. The Importance of Delabeling Β-Lactam Allergy in Children." The Journal of Pediatrics. 2019; 204: 291-297.

15.   Timm AL, Ewa BO, Marius MA, Sylvain ME, Christian ZW, Stefan BR and Harald HO. Photolysis of Four ΒLactam Antibiotics under Simulated Environmental Conditions: Degradation, Transformation Products and Antibacterial Activity." Science of The Total Environment. 2019; 651: 1605-1612.

16.   Zagursky RO and Michael PI. Cross-Reactivity in Β-Lactam Allergy. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2018; 6(1) 72-81.

17.   Tayari MA, Zahra MO, Fatemeh MO, Mostafa RE, and Marzieh. Heterotropic Effect of Β-Lactam Antibiotics on Antioxidant Property of Haptoglobin (2-2)-Hemoglobin Complex." Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2011; 10(2) 313.

18.   Shahani SO, Farzaneh BE, Danial JA, Maryam GH and Fatemeh SH. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Nasturtium Officinale Involved in Attenuation of Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity." Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. 2017; 27(2) 104-107.

19.   Hussein AB, Mohammed GH, Khaled MA and Osama AB. Beta Lactams Antibiotic Ceftriaxone Modulates Seizures, Oxidative Stress and Connexin 43 Expression in Hippocampus of Pentylenetetrazole Kindled Rats." Journal of Epilepsy Research. 2016; 6(1): 1-8.

20.   Zeynep C, Senem A and Zulbiye K. Reaction of aminopyrimidine derivatives with chloroacetyl chloride and isopthaloyl chloride.

21.   Suaad MH, Hala AR, Suhad FA. Synthesis, Identification and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities of some New N-substituted 2-azetidinone, Imidazolidinone and tetrazole derivatives of 2-(methylthio) benzimidazole " International Journal of Science and Research. 2015; 6(1): 2319-7064.

22.   Safa T and Hasan G. Synthesis and characterization of β-Lactam compounds" JPOCR. 2016; 8(8): 730-738.

23.   Ahmed WN and Atheer MM. Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Derivatives Containing Four, Five, Six and Seven Membered Rings from 6-Methyl 2-Thiouracil and Evaluation their Biological Activity.2015.

24.   Das M, Das B and Samanta A. Antioxidant and anticancer activity of synthesized 4amino5((aryl substituted)4H1, 2, 4triazole3yl) thiolinked hydroxamic acid derivatives. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2019.

25.   Philip S, Jayasree EG and Mohanan K. Antidiabetic, antioxidant, DFT and molecular docking studies of a triazene derivative and its transition metal complexes. Research on Chemical Intermediates. 2019; 1-25.

26.   Verma G. A Review Exploring Therapeutic Worth of 1, 3, 4-Oxadiazole Tailored Compounds. Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2019; 19(6): 477-509.

27.   Krishna S. GCMS analysis, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of ethanol extract of Anisomeles malabarica (L.) R. Br. ex. Sims leaves. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2019; 5(1): 180-187.

28.   Haida Z and Hakiman M. A comprehensive review on the determination of enzymatic assay and nonenzymatic antioxidant activities. Food Science & Nutrition. 2019; 7(5): 1555-1563.

29.   Redhab A and Suaad MH. Synthesis, Characterization and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity for New Heterocyclic Derivatives Containing Pentagonal, Hexagonal Rings" Iraqi Journal of Science. 2014; 55(4): 1694-1707.

30.   Shriner R, Fuson R, Cartin D and Morril T. The systematic Identification of Organic Compounds). John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. 1980; 8th ed.

31.   Silverstein We.  Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds. USA, John Wiley & Sons. 2005; 7ed.

32.   Lim S. Evaluation of antioxidant activities of various solvent extract from Sargassum serratifolium and its major antioxidant components. Food Chemistry. 2019; 278: 178-184.

33.   Cesari L, Mutelet F and Canabady L. Antioxidant properties of phenolic surrogates of lignin depolymerisation. Industrial Crops and Products. 2019; 129: 480-487.

 

 

 

 

Received on 12.11.2019           Modified on 27.01.2020

Accepted on 16.03.2020         © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(11):5317-5327.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00930.0